Saturday, October 21, 2017






BAPTISM IN THE NAME OF JESUS


Every time the Bible records the name or formula associated with an actual baptism in the New Testament church, it describes the name Jesus.
All five such accounts occur in the Book of Acts, the history book of the early church.
Let us examine each one.

THE JEWS ON THE DAY OF PENTECOST

On the birthday of the new Testament church, the first Day of Pentecost after the ascension of Jesus, the Holy Spirit baptized the waiting 120 disciples, just as Jesus had promised. (See Acts 2).
When they were filled with the Spirit, they began to speak miraculously in languages they had never learned, as the Spirit gave the utterance, and this miracle attracted a large multitude.
The apostle Peter, with the support of the other eleven apostles, preached the gospel to the thousands of curious onlookers (Acts 2:14)

14 But Peter, standing up with the eleven, raised his voice and said to them, “Men of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and heed my words.
The crowd consisted of Jews from various nations who had gathered in Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Pentecost.
Peter began by explaining what had aroused their curiosity—the phenomenon of speaking in tongues and identified it with the prophecy of Joel that God would pour out His Spirit in the last days.
Peter continued quoting from Joel until he reached the following statement: (Acts 2:21)
21 And it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord Shall be saved.’

From this point he introduced the crowd to the Lord—Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

He preached the simple gospel message, namely, the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:22-36: 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)

His message culminated with the proclamation, “God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36).

Conviction of sin gripped the hearts of the listeners, and they “said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? (Acts 2:37).

They were not asking how to receive an extra blessing, but how to obey the gospel Peter had just preached. They wanted to know how to be forgiven of their sins, including their rejection of the Messiah. They wanted to know how to accept Jesus as Lord and Messiah. In short, they wanted to know how to be saved.  Peter and the other apostles told them how to respond to the gospel message: (Acts 2:38-39)

38 Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.”

About three thousand people believed and obeyed these instructions and were baptized accordingly (Acts 2:41) 41 Then those who gladly[a] received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them.

By repentance people die to sin and self-will, thereby identifying with Christ’s death.

By baptism they are buried with Christ. And by receiving the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of the risen Lord, they identify with Christ’s resurrection.
 (See Romans 6:1-7; 7:6; 8:2, 10-11)

It is important to note that the apostles commanded “every one of you” to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and that the message applied to “as many as the Lord our God shall call.”

Baptism in Jesus’ name is an integral part of responding properly to the gospel message and accepting Jesus as Lord.

Despite this clear, unambiguous instruction and the universality of its application, some people argue that it is directed only to Jews.

Since the Jews already acknowledge the Father, they contend, the Jews merely need to add a profession of faith in Jesus, but the rest of humanity should be baptized into a trinity of divine persons.

The account in Acts 8 refutes this theory, however.

THE SAMARITANS

In Acts 8, Philip the evangelist brought the gospel to the -Samaritans, who were descendants of intermarriages between Jews and Gentiles.
Although they were not Jews, they also “were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 8:16).

Some people try to explain that even though the Samaritans were not Jews, their religion was largely based upon Judaism and like the Jews they already acknowledged the Father.
Thus, these people claim, baptism in the name of Jesus alone was appropriate for them as well but is not meant for everyone.
The next account, however, dispels this supposition.

THE GENTILES

In Acts 10, God let the apostle Peter to preach the gospel to the Gentiles.
As he preached to Cornelius, a Roman centurion, and his household, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, just as on the Day of Pentecost.
The Jewish Christians who had accompanied Peter were astonished “because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost” (Acts 10:45).
From this reaction, it is obvious that these people were Gentiles and were not previous converts to Judaism (proselytes).
Gentile proselytes were considered full Jews, and proselytes had been in the crown on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:10)
45 And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also.”
But these people were uncircumcised Gentiles, and consequently Peter later had to explain to the church why he had broken Jewish tradition by visiting the home of unconverted Gentiles and eating with them (Acts 11:1-4)
11 Now the apostles and brethren who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter came up to Jerusalem, those of the circumcision contended with him, saying, “You went in to uncircumcised men and ate with them!”
But Peter explained it to them in order from the beginning, saying:
Although these Gentiles were neither Jews nor Samaritans, immediately after they received the Holy Spirit, Peter “commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 10:48).
Of course, the name of the Lord is Jesus (Philippians 2:11) 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
In fact, the oldest Greek manuscripts in existence today actually read “in the name of Jesus Christ” here, as do most versions today.
Some try to explain that Jesus Name baptism is only for Gentiles who already believe in the God of Israel, but 1 Corinthians shows that it is also for the most pagan of Gentiles.
Corinth was a Greek city notorious for idolatry and immorality. The church in Corinth was full of divisions, with various groups claiming to be followers of Paul, Apollos, Peter, or Christ (1 Corinthians 1:12).
 12 Now I say this, that each of you says, “I am of Paul,” or “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of Cephas,” or “I am of Christ.”
When Paul rebuked them for their divisions, he asked, “Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul” 1 Corinthians 1:13).
The obvious answer to the two latter questions is, “No, Jesus Christ was crucified for us. No, we were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.”
Since they were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, not Paul, they belonged to Christ, not Paul.
Paul’s point was this: Since Jesus died for the whole church and the whole church was baptized in His name, the whole church should unite in following Him.
If the Corinthians were not baptized in Jesus’ name, Paul’s argument makes no sense.
A few chapters later, Paul alluded to their Jesus Name baptism again, showing it was administered to everyone, even those who had been the most pagan and immoral:
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 
10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.”
In short, the New Testament reveals that people in every conceivable class are to be baptized in the name of Jesus—whether Jews, Samaritans (part Jews), or Gentiles (non-Jews).

The disciples of john at ephesus

Faced with the undeniable evidence we have discussed; many people concede that baptism in the name of Jesus is acceptable.
Some even agree that it is the original method and that it is to be preferred. Yet many of the same people say, “I have already been baptized another way so I don’t see the need to be re-baptized. After all, it’s the intent of my heart that counts.”
In Acts 19, Paul met some disciples at Ephesus who had been baptized according to the teaching of John the Baptist.
John was a prophet of God, and his baptism was ordained of God for his time (Luke 7:28-30).
28 For I say to you, among those born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist; but he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.”
29 And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John. 30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.
John baptized by immersion in water (Matthew 3:16); 16 When He had been baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting upon Him.
(John 3:23) 23 Now John also was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because there was much water there. And they came and were baptized.
And he required repentance and confession of sins before he would administer baptism (Mark 1:4-5)
John came baptizing in the wilderness and preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. Then all the land of Judea, and those from Jerusalem, went out to him and were all baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing their sins.
(Luke 3:7-8) Then he said to the multitudes that came out to be baptized by him, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, and do not begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones.
Nevertheless, when Paul learned that these disciples at Ephesus had received only John’s baptism, he explained to them that John’s ministry pointed to Jesus Christ, and then he baptized them a second time.
This time, “they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Acts 19:5).
The only difference between the two baptisms was their new understanding of Jesus and the invocation of the name of Jesus upon them.
Although their prior baptism had been a positive step towards God, Paul did not tell these men to be content with it.
Nor did he say that their new knowledge and faith made a further step unnecessary.
Instead, he considered the name of Jesus to be so important that, although their previous baptism was done upon repentance and faith, by immersion in water, and by a man of God, he re-baptized them in order for them to take on the name of Jesus in baptism.
Likewise, we do not attack, ridicule, or condemn anyone who has taken a step towards God in baptism.
In a world of unbelief, apathy, and even hatred of God, any attempt to please God and fulfill His Word is commendable.
But once a person understands the complete biblical message of the identity of Jesus Christ and the importance of baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, he should not be content with what he has done in the past.
If he has never been baptized in the name of Jesus, following the apostolic precedent he should be re-baptized with the invocation of that name.


THE APOSTLE PAUL


Some people try to sidestep the whole issue of the baptismal formula by saying that “in the name of Jesus” dos not mean to invoke the name but merely to act upon the power and authority of Jesus.
But the way to act upon His power and authority is to invoke His name in faith in obedience to His Word.
The conversion of Saul of Tarsus (later the apostle Paul) provides a good example.
When Saul came to Ananias as the Lord had directed him, Ananias instructed him, 16 “Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.’” (Acts 22:16).
Saul knew exactly what the Lord’s name was, for he had recently asked, “Who are thou, Lord?” and the Lord had replied, “I am Jesus” (Acts 9:5)
The command of Ananias shows that the name of Jesus is to be called at water baptism. He Greek verb translated “calling” here literally means “invoking”.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NAME IN BAPTISM

The Book of Acts establishes that the apostles and the early church consistently baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.
This pattern is the norm for the church today.
It is our responsibility to obey the commands and examples in the Book of Acts.
Obedience is the only course open to us if we truly accept the Bible as our sole authority for faith and practice and if we truly desire to make Jesus the Lord of all of our life, including our thoughts, values, beliefs, and practices.
Baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is not an arbitrary practice, however. Using the name of Jesus in baptism is inextricably linked with the very purpose of baptism itself.
All the reasons for being baptized in water are also reasons for invoking the name of Jesus at baptism.
As a minimum, all groups in Christendom agree that the purpose of water baptism is to express faith in Jesus as Lord and Savior.
When the listeners on the Day of Pentecost accepted Jesus as Lord and Messiah, they were baptized (Acts 2:36-38, 41) 36 “Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?”
38 Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
41 Then those who gladly[a] received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them.
When the Samaritans “believed Philip preaching… concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized” (Acts 8:12).
When the disciples of John at Ephesus heard that Jesus was the fulfillment of the prophecy of John the Baptist, they were baptized (Acts 19:4-5).
When the Corinthians “believed on the Lord,” they were baptized (Acts 18:8).
The proper way to express faith in Jesus is to confess His name, and in each of the cases just cited, the candidates expressed their faith in Jesus by being baptized in the name of Jesus.
2) Baptism is “for remission of sins” (Acts 2:38), or to “wash away … sins” (Acts 22:16), and the name of Jesus is the only name given for remission of sins (Acts 10:43).
Thus, the proper way to seek remission of sins at baptism is to invoke the name of Jesus in faith.
Acts 2:38 and Acts 22:16 not only connect remission of sins with water baptism, but they specifically connect remission of sins with water baptism in the name of Jesus.
3. Baptism is part of our salvation (Mark 16:16) 16 He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.
(1 Peter 3:21), and the name of Jesus is the only name given for salvation.
(Acts 4:12) 21 There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
(See Acts 2:21; Romans 10:9, 13).
Thus, the proper way to integrate water baptism with the New Testament salvation experience is to invoke the name of Jesus.
4. Baptism is a burial with Jesus Christ (Romans 6:4) Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
(Colossians 2:12) 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.
The Spirit of God did not die for us; only Jesus the man died for us and was buried in the tomb.
To be buried with Jesus Christ, we should be baptized in His name.
5. Baptism is part of our personal identification with Jesus Christ. “So many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death” (Romans 6:3).
“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ” (Galatians 3:27).
If we seek to be identified with Him, we should take on His name.
6. Baptism is part of the new birth by which we are born into the spiritual family of God (John 3:5) Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.
(Titus 3:5)not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit,
We can also view the conversion experience, of which baptism is a part, as an adoption into the spiritual family of God (Romans 8:15-16)
15 For you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, “Abba, Father.” 
16 The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,
A newly born or adopted child always takes on the name of his new family. Since we seek to enter into the church of Jesus Christ, which is called His body and His bride, we should take on His name.
See (Ephesians 5:23, 29-32)
7. Baptism is part of our spiritual circumcision, or initiation into the new covenant (Colossians 2:11-13)
11 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins[a] of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ,
 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.
13 And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses,
Under the old covenant a male child officially received his name at his physical circumcision. (Luke 2:21)
21 And when eight days were completed for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
Water baptism is the time when our new family name is invoked upon us at our spiritual circumcision.
In connection with the last two points, we know that the identifying name of our new spiritual family is Jesus, for at least two reasons.
First, it is the only name in which we can receive salvation (John 14:6) Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
(Acts 4:12) 12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
Second, it is the supreme name by which God has chosen to reveal Himself to us. (Philippians 2:9-11) “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father.
Some people say that the supreme name described in Philippians 2:9 is Lord. That is, God has given the man Jesus the supreme title of Lord.
Although Jesus was openly and miraculously declared to be Lord by the resurrection and ascension, this declaration does not detract from the supremacy of Jesus as the personal name of God incarnate.
The title of Lord serves to magnify the name of Jesus and underscore its true meaning.
As an analogy, the highest political office and title in the United States is that of president.
When Abraham Lincoln was the president he had the highest title: nevertheless, his unique name—the name that embodied his legal identity, power, and authority—was still Abraham Lincoln.
He could not merely sign documents as “Mr. President”; he had to sign them as “Abraham Lincoln” in order for his signature to be effective.
Philippians 2:10 specifically states that at the name of Jesus every knee will bow.
 Verses 10-11 do not merely say that everyone will acknowledge the existence of a supreme Lord, for many unsaved people already do that; the significance is that everyone will acknowledge that Jesus is the one Lord.
As Bauer´s lexicon translates, “when the name of Jesus is mentioned” every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord.
And this event will fulfill the proclamation of Jehovah, who said, (Isaiah 45:23)
I have sworn by Myself;
The word has gone out of My mouth in righteousness,
And shall not return,
That to Me every knee shall bow,
Every tongue shall take an oath.

At the last judgment, every being will acknowledge Jesus as the one God incarnate.
Colossians 3:17 says, 17 And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him.
This verse does not require us to pronounce the name of Jesus orally before every activity, but it deals with the attitude in which we conduct every activity.
All our words and actions should be consistent with the invocation of Jesus as Lord.
When there is cause to invoke God´s name formally, such as at water baptism, which is both word and deed, this verse applies in a specific way, telling us to approach God in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Just as we pray, lay hands on the sick, and cast out demons in the name of Jesus, so we should baptize in the name of Jesus.


CONCLUSION


Using the name of Jesus in the baptismal formula expresses faith in
v The person of Christ (who He really is);
v The work of Christ (His death, burial, and resurrection for our salvation); and
v The power and authority of Christ (His ability to save us by Himself).
In short, baptism in the name of Jesus signifies that we trust in Jesus alone as our Savior, and thus it expresses the essence of saving faith.

Since the only one who can take away sins is Jesus—not us by our deeds, not the water, and not the preacher—we call upon Him in faith, depending on Him to do the work.
The Bible teaches that everyone should be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, and it reveals that every reason for baptism is specifically a reason for baptism in the name of Jesus.

Thus baptism in the name of Jesus demonstrates reverence for and obedience to the Word of God over and above human tradition, convenience, or peer pressure.
In view of the scriptural significance of the name of Jesus, why would anyone refuse to be baptized in Jesus’ name?

Why would anyone hesitate to take on the name of the One who died for us ad to identify publicly with Him?

Why would anyone reject the only saving name, the name that is above every name?






Monday, October 16, 2017

Note: Notice in the picture the pagan and masonic symbols of the Catholic Trinity the Sun worship, and the masonic  triangle, common to find in their pictures and engravings.  


PAGAN TRINITIES

Whenever the authorities of the Old Testament books used the term Elohim to refer to the God of Israel, they consistently used a singular verb.
In Genesis 1:1 Elohim is the One doing the creating, with the Hebrew verb for “create” in the singular.
In other words, the verb has a singular pronoun as a suffix, meaning He created.
On the other hand, whenever the writers of the old Testament discussed the many gods and goddesses of neighboring lands, they consistently used a plural verb in writing about the elohim, the gods of the nations. For then they were writing about polytheism.
What is of particular interest is, that the Hebrew Old Testament also uses the term in reference to one specific pagan deity.
For some time now, certain authors have claimed that the use of Elohim shows that the God of the Bible is a trinity of three persons. Is this accurate?
If the Elohim of Israel is a trinity of three persons, what about the elohim of the nations?
Judges 11:24 calls the pagan deity Chemosh by the term elohim, “a god.” Judges 8:33 refers to Baa-berith, who also is called elohim.
Judges 16:23 designates the famous god of the Philistines, Dagon, as elohim. Baal-zebub was a god of Ekron, and 2 Kings 1:2-3 calls him elohim. Nisroch, a god of Assyria, is referred to as elohim in 2 Kings 19:37.
In 1 Kings 11:5 the writer records that “Solomon went after Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Sidonians.”
This example is worthy of special note because the term “Ashtoreth” has the suffix -eth, the regular Hebrew ending for a singular feminine noun. And yet this goddess is called none other than elohim—a masculine plural noun in spelling!
Here is our question: Were these pagan gods trinities? Chemosh was an elohim, but was he a trinity of three persons?
Dagon was an elohim; was he a trinity? The goddess Ashtoreth was an elohim was she a deity of three persons? Each pagan deity was known individually as an elohim, but it surely was not considered to be a trinity of three divine persons.
“For Yahweh, He is Elohim; and there is no other beside Him” (Deut. 4:35

            THERE IS ONE EL

If the term Elohim would imply a plurality of persons in the Godhead, then that Godhead would be composed of more than one El—since El is the abbreviated singular form of Elohim.
But the Scriptures show conclusively that there is but one El, Yahweh Himself.
King David praised Yahweh by acknowledging that “the El of Israel … gives power and strength to His people” (Psalm 68:35).
Several passages in Isaiah shine forth with the glory of El, the Mighty God of Israel. Through this prophet, Yahweh proclaimed:
·         Remember the former things of old, For I am El, and there is no other;” (Isaiah 46:9)
·         “Look to Me, and be saved.…
For I am El, and there is no other.”
(Isaiah 45:22)
·         “… I am He. Before Me no El was formed; nor shall there be any after Me.” (Isaiah 43:10)
·          
Clearly, the God of the Hebrew Scriptures is one Mighty God—one El—not two or three.








1 John 5:7 


The Bible is its own interpreter. And we hold to the premise that we can use any version, and prove the truth.

And of course, history is always one of the greatest elements to help us with this. Therefore, let me give you an example, using a Bible that still has 1 John 5:7. Then you can see how we use the Bible, even if it´s an old version, to prove what God intended when the writers put these things together.

I still recommend that you read the text in different versions, so you can come to a solid conclusion.


Explanation of 1 John 5:7 
using the Bible as its own interpreter


1 John 5:7 “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”

Although this verse of Scripture is often used by those who believe in three persons of God, it actually refutes this view, for it says that “these three are one.

Some interpret this phrase to mean one in unity as a man and wife are one. But it should be pointed out that this view is essentially polytheistic.

If the word one referred to unity instead of a numerical designation, then the Godhead can be viewed as many gods in a united council or government. I unity were meant, the verse should have read, “These three agree as one.”

It is also interesting to note that this verse does not use the word Son, but Word.  If Son were the special name of a separate person in the Godhead, and if this verse were trying to teach separate persons, why did it use Word instead of Son?

Son does not refer primarily to deity, but Word does. The Word is not a separate person from the Father and more than a man and his word are separate persons.

Rather, the Word is the thought or plan in the mind of God and also the expression of God.
In a similar way, the Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit is not a separate person from the Father any more than a man and his spirit are separate persons.

Holy Spirit just describes what God is. 

1 John 5:7 says that three bear record in heaven; that is, God has recorded Himself in three modes of activity or has revealed Himself in three ways. He has at least three heavenly roles: Father, Word (not Son), and Holy Ghost.


Furthermore, these three roles describe one God “these three are one.”


MATTHEW 28:19 AUTHENTIC OR FALSE?


Ten Tests to verify the authenticity of a text
  1. Test of context         
  2. Test of frequency
  3. Test of Doctrine
  4. Test of analogy
  5. Test of consequence
  6. Test of practice
  7. Test of significance
  8. Test of parallel account
  9. Test of complimentary citation
  10. Test of principle

INTRODUCTION

      1 Tess. 5:21: “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good”.
      In this verse, the Greek word translated as “prove” is DOKIMAZO and it means: “to test, examine, prove, scrutinize (to see whether a thing is genuine or not)
      To recognize as genuine after examination; to approve, deem worthy”
1.    The Test of Context
In our effort to determine which reading of Matthew 28:19 is original we will submit both rendering to ten “tests”.
In doing so we will be able to recognize the genuine, and the spurious.

      In our effort to determine which reading of Matthew 28:19 is original we will submit both rendering to ten “tests”.
      In doing so we will be able to recognize the genuine, and the spurious.
      When examining the context we find that today’s Trinitarian wording lacks syntax, that is, the true understanding of the verse is obscured by a failure of the varying concepts to harmonize.

Definition of Syntax

      a :  the way in which linguistic elements (as words) are put together to form constituents (as phrases or clauses)
      b :  the part of grammar dealing with this
      2 :  a connected or orderly system :  harmonious arrangement of parts or elements <the syntax of classical architecture>
(Merriam Webster

      The sequence in which words are put together to form sentences. In English, the usual sequence is subject, verb, and object. Note: Syntactic languages, such as English, use word order to indicate word relationships. (Dictionary .com)

      syn·tax
      noun
the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.

      Exegesis is concerned with discovering the true meaning of the text, respecting its grammar, syntax, and setting.

      Hermaneutics: The theory and methodology of interpretation, especially of scriptural text.
      When looking for a Bible hermeneutics definition, the simplest is: Bible interpretations. Bible hermeneutics even occur within the Bible itself.


1.    THE TEST OF CONTEX

·         If however, we read as follows, the whole context fits together and the progression of the instructions is comprehensible
·         “All power is given unto me…go therefore…make disciples in my name, teaching them… whatsoever I have commanded … I am with you… Matthew. 28:18-20.

2.    THE TEST OF FREQUENCY

·         Is the phrase “In the name of the Father, and of the Son and the Holy Spirit” used elsewhere in the Scripture?
·         NOT ONCE did Jesus use the phrase.
·         IN MY NAME on the other hand, YES. 17 times to be exact.




3.    PROOF OF FREQUENCY 

Examples of Jesus using “In My name”

·         Matt. 18:20
·         Mark 9:37, 39, 41
·         Mark 16:17
·         John 14:13, 14, 26
·         John 15:16
·         John 16:23, 24, 26


·         THE TEST OF DOCTRINE:

·         Is any statement in Scripture based on the fact of baptism in the name of Jesus?
·         YES.
·         In the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost       ( one time)
·         In MY NAME                                                                   ( 17 TIMES )


4.    THE TEST OF DOCTRINE:

·         This is clarified in 1 Cor. 1:13:
·         “Is Christ divided?
·         Was Paul crucified for you?
·         Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
·         These words, when carefully analyzed, suggest that believers should be baptized in the name of the One who was crucified for them.
·         Therefore believers must be baptized in water in His name.
·         “To put Christ on; to be invested with His name, the person is immersed into His name. Romans 13:14
·         Baptism is linked inseparably with the death of Christ.
·         It is the means of the believer’s identification with the Lord’s death”. (God’s Way, pg. 190)
·         “Buried with Him (Jesus) in baptism” Rom. 6:3-5.
·         We should never displace Jesus from His position
·         Read Acts 4:12
·         Acts 4:12 “And in none other is there salvation: for neither is there any other name under heaven, that is given among men, wherein we must be saved.”



·         THE TEST OF ANALOGY:

·         Does any other Scripture make reference to baptism in the Triune name? NO
·         Does any other Scripture reference baptism in the name of Jesus? YES
·         The Holy Spirit was promised by Jesus to come in “His name”
·         “Send in my name” John 14:26.
·         John 14:26 - But the Comforter, even the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, he shall teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said unto you.
·         Baptism by water in HIS NAME
·         Baptism of the Holy Spirit in HIS NAME
·         John 16:7: “If I depart, I will send Him unto you.”
·         John 14:26: “The Holy Ghost sent in My name”
·         Acts 8:12: “Believers in the name of Jesus are baptized”
·         Acts 8:12 - But when they believed Philip preaching good tidings concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
·         Note: They were baptized as a result of the preaching of the name of Jesus Christ, NOT the titles “Father, Son and Holy Ghost”
·         Example:
·         Acts 2:38, 39 -  And Peter said unto them, Repent ye, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of your sins; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
·         39 For to you is the promise, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call unto him.
·         Acts 19:1-5  1. While Apollos was at Corinth, Paul passed through the upper country and came to Ephesus. There he found some disciples.  And he said to them “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?”
·         And they said, “No, we have never even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.”
·          3 And he said, “Into what then were you baptized?” They said, “Into John’s baptism.”
·         4 And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.”
·          5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.



5.    THE TEST OF CONSEQUENCE:

·         When we are baptized, do we put on the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost? NO
·         Do we put on the name of Jesus? YES
·         When we are baptized in the name of Jesus, according to all baptismal account rendered in Scripture, “we are literally being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ”
·         Gal. 3:27 – “For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ”.
·         Every baptism mentions a clear connection with the person of Christ and His atoning sacrifice.



6.    THE TEST OF PRACTICE

  • As the disciples were implementing the great commission, did they ever baptize in three names? NEVER
·         Did they ever baptize in the name of Jesus? ALWAYS.
·         Examples: Acts 2:38;
·         And Peter said to them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
·         Acts 8:16 - for it had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
·         Acts 10:48 (inferred) And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days.
·         Acts 19:5 - On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.




7.    THE TEST OF SIGNIFICANCE

·         What significance is mentioned in Scripture for baptizing in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost? NONE
·         The Bible teaches that baptism in the name of Jesus is an act of repentance leading to the forgiveness of sins. Acts 2:38
·         Baptism in His name alone is associated with the promise of His Holy Spirit. Acts 2:38; Acts 19:1-5; Mat. 3:11
·         Acts 2:38 - Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
·         Acts 19:1-5 “And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples
·         he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?”
·         So they said to him, “We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.”
·         And he said to them, “Into what then were you baptized?”
·         So they said, “Into John’s baptism.”
·         Then Paul said, “John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.”
·         When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
·         Baptism in Jesus name states our willingness to be a living sacrifice or even to die with Christ. Rom. 6:1-4; Col. 2:12
·         Being baptized into Christ is how we put on Christ. Gal 3:27
·         Baptism in His name is called the “circumcision of Christ” and reflects our “putting off” of the Man of sin therefore becoming a new creature in Christ Jesus. Col. 2:11, 12; 2 Cor. 5:17.
·         Baptism in the name of Jesus expresses faith in the physical life of Jesus; the crucifixion for our sins and the remission of sin through His name.
a.    Note: Trinitarian baptism can only express faith in Catholic Theology itself.





8.    THE TEST OF PARALLEL ACCOUNTS

·         Matthew 28 is not the only record in the gospels of the Great Commission.
·         Luke also recorded this event in great detail in Luke 24:46, 47.
·         Luke 24:46-47 “Then He said to them, “Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day,
·          47 and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
·         He (Luke) wrote of Jesus speaking in the third person “And that repentance preached in His name among all nations.”
·         This passage recorded by Luke in contradiction to the falsified text establishes the correct wording of Matthew 28:19 where Jesus spoke in the first person: “in My name”.
·         Mark also records another version of the Great Commission using some of the same pattern of speech:
·         Mark 16:15-18.“Go ye… all the world, preach the gospel… every creature … baptized .. IN MY NAME”   THE COMMISSION
·         The Great Commission that Jesus instructed His disciples, including baptism, was to be done in Jesus name “My name”.


9.    THE TEST OF COMPLIMENTARY CITATION

·         There is no complimentary citation of Trinitarian baptism anywhere in the Bible


·         Matthew contains the commission of Christ to His apostles while the Romans account is Paul’s acceptance of his own commission as an apostle.
·         Matthew 28:18-20
·         1. All power is given to me
·         2. Go ye
·         3. Teaching them to observe
·         4. All nations
·         5. In My name


1.    THE TEST OF PRINCIPLE
·         It is written: “Whatsoever we do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus” Col. 3:17
·         In this principle laid down by Paul, the implication is clear.
·         The word “whatsoever” would of certain necessity include baptism, which is a command involving both word and deed.
·         The traditional wording of Matthew containing the Trinitarian wording is clearly NOT in accordance with the above principle.
·         The shorter wording without the falsified insertion follows this principle.
·         Which of the two wording is the contradictory one?
·         God’s word does not contradict itself, rather it compliments and explains itself.
·         Paul not only expressed this principle, but he applied it specifically to the topic of baptism.
·         In Acts 19:1-6 there is an account concerning the disciples of John who had been baptized under his ministry.
·         Like baptism in Jesus name, John’s baptism was one of repentance for the remission of sin (Mark 1:4; Acts 2:38).
·         John’s message which accompanied his baptism, was that ONE would come after him, who would “take away the sins of the world” and baptize with the Holy Spirit”. John 1:29
·         Paul introduced these disciples to that ONE and applied the above principle.
·         “When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
·         “And when Paul laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came upon them”. Acts 19:2-6.

·         And so, applying the test of the principle to our two readings of Matthew 28:19 , we find very strong support for the phrase: “In My name” and not the Trinitarian version we find in the King James Bible.












JESÚS  SUMO SACERDOTE DE LA ORDEN DE MELQUISEDEC La verdad del Padre Y el ...